Skip to main content

Early preview — reporting is not open yet. Do not send real evidence through this website.

REKODI

Owner-authorized historical source collection

NCPB–Erad maize case: convictions quashed; civil award challenge sent back

  • Public funds and procurement
  • Court record
  • Decision issued
  • Original research collection (64 inputs)
  • Gemini collection (50 inputs)

Owner-authorized historical notes, prepared with AI assistance. They were NOT personally reviewed by an activated REKODI publisher and are not publisher-approved court records or signed editorial releases. The project owner authorized this finite batch on 26 October 2026.

Each entry states its checking date and limits. Earlier research dates of 20–24 October are retained; the Gemini additions received targeted source checks on 26 October. These are not complete certified docket searches. An allegation is not a finding of guilt, and a historical sentence does not prove present custody.

Case text: English source summary.

Summary

On 11 October 2024 the Court of Appeal set aside the criminal convictions and sentences of Grace Sarapay Wakhungu, John Koyi Waluke and Erad Supplies and General Contracts in the National Cereals and Produce Board maize-arbitration case. In separate civil proceedings, on 7 November 2025 the Court of Appeal sent the challenge to the arbitral award back to the High Court for determination, expressly making no conclusive finding of misrepresentation. The earlier long prison terms reported in 2020 are no longer operative.

Wakhungu & 2 others v Republic [2024] KECA 1426 (KLR) · Court of Appeal at Nairobi · Case number: Criminal Appeals E039 of 2022 and 077 and 078 of 2023 (consolidated)

Mixed outcomes — see individual findings · Further appeal status unknownAppeal judgment · Decided

Outcome and procedural limits

Criminal: convictions and sentences of Grace Sarapay Wakhungu, John Koyi Waluke and Erad Supplies were set aside on 11 October 2024. Civil: on 7 November 2025 the Court of Appeal remitted the challenge to the arbitral award to the High Court without conclusive findings. The civil merits are unresolved.

Appeal status

Judgment texts last read 20 October 2026; searches on 24 October 2026 found no further criminal appeal or post-remittal High Court ruling.

Later decisions

Paragraph references

  • Final orders — Convictions and sentences set aside

Source/status check date

What the record establishes

  • The criminal convictions were quashed on appeal.
  • The civil challenge to the award was reopened in the High Court.

What it does not establish

  • The civil reopening does not revive the criminal case.
  • The arbitral sums are not proven stolen funds.

Public sources and attribution

Public-interest scope

Accurate, attributed public court records concerning public administration, public resources and the limits of state enforcement powers.

Publication basis

Owner-authorized historical catalogue, batch authorized 2026-10-26; AI-assisted preparation.

Back to historical cases