Skip to main content

Early preview — reporting is not open yet. Do not send real evidence through this website.

REKODI
REKODI

Owner-authorized historical source collection

Youth Fund consultancy payments: convictions upheld on second appeal

  • Public funds and procurement
  • Court record
  • Decision issued
  • Original research collection (64 inputs)

Owner-authorized historical notes, prepared with AI assistance. They were NOT personally reviewed by an activated REKODI publisher and are not publisher-approved court records or signed editorial releases. The project owner authorized this finite batch on 26 October 2026.

Each entry states its checking date and limits. Earlier research dates of 20–24 October are retained; the Gemini additions received targeted source checks on 26 October. These are not complete certified docket searches. An allegation is not a finding of guilt, and a historical sentence does not prove present custody.

Case text: English source summary.

Summary

On 24 October 2025 the Court of Appeal dismissed Mukuria Ngamau's second appeal in the Youth Enterprise Development Fund consultancy case, which concerned payments to Quorandum Limited for purported ICT consultancy supported by false documents. Convictions for fraudulent acquisition of public property and making false documents remain. The High Court had earlier set aside the conspiracy conviction and its sentence. The trial court's compensation order recited in the judgment is KSh189,364,789; that figure is a court order, not proof of recovery. Co-accused who died before judgment are not found guilty by this record.

Ngamau & another v Republic [2025] KECA 1753 (KLR) · Court of Appeal at Nairobi · Case number: Criminal Appeals E115 and E116 of 2023 (consolidated)

Criminal conviction · No further appeal locatedAppeal judgment · Decided

Outcome and procedural limits

The Court of Appeal dismissed the second appeal in its entirety. The convictions on counts 2, 3, 10 and 11 stand; the conspiracy count had already ended in acquittal in the High Court in 2023. The judgment recites the trial sentences, including a compensation order of KSh189,364,789. Payment, recovery and time in custody are not verified.

Appeal status

This is the second-appeal judgment. A targeted search on 24 October 2026 found no Supreme Court step; this is not a certified docket search. The narrative figure of KSh180,364,789 used in some accounts is not the court-recited compensation order and is not used here.

Paragraph references

  • 8–9 — Trial sentences and High Court acquittal on count 1 recited
  • 60–63 — Evaluation and disposition: appeal dismissed in its entirety

Source/status check date

What the record establishes

  • The second appeal was dismissed and the convictions on counts 2, 3, 10 and 11 stand.
  • The conspiracy conviction had been set aside by the High Court in 2023.

What it does not establish

  • The record does not show that any fine or compensation has been paid or recovered.
  • Default prison terms are not evidence of time actually served.
  • No finding is made against co-accused whose cases abated on death.

Public sources and attribution

Public-interest scope

Accurate, attributed public court records concerning public administration, public resources and the limits of state enforcement powers.

Publication basis

Owner-authorized historical catalogue, batch authorized 2026-10-26; AI-assisted preparation.

Back to historical cases